Police Investigation

Author: Nandini Mangla

2nd Year BBA LL.B
BVDU, New Law College, Pune

ABSTRACT: The police in one nation is the instrument for implementing the Rule of Law, they are the methods by which socialized society keeps everything under control that individuals may live securely in their homes and go openly about their legitimate business. In this way, police are the law authorization organization whose key obligation is to serve humanity and defend people groups live and property, to secure the guiltless against double-dealing, the powerless against persecution or terrorizing, serene against savagery and jumble and to regard sacred privileges, everything being equal, to freedom, balance, and equity. Police power is an established assemblage of people engaged by the state to uphold the law, to secure individuals and property, and to forestall wrongdoing and common jumble.


The police of the state in an extensive sense grasp its entire arrangement of the interior’s guidelines by which the state looks for not exclusively to safeguard the public request furthermore, to forestall offences against the state, yet in addition to set up for the intercourse of resident to resident. The word ‘police’ is gotten from the Greek word ‘Politeia’ or it’s Latin equal ‘political’ which signifies “common administration1.”The term ‘Police’ implies a collection of workers whose essential obligations are conservation of request, anticipation, and identification of violations and requirement of law. In India the incredible old law provider Manu accentuated the need for police power for the upkeep of peace. He recommended that police capacities could be endowed to just those who were very much familiar with the nearby individuals and were committed to the reason of assurance of society against law violators. Even though it tends to be followed that in India police won in the reigns of Hindu rulers and Mughal rulers however the English government instituted the systematized police law and subsequently the police demonstration, 1861 for India. 

After the institution of the act of 1861 different proposals were made at various stretches for the development of the analyst wing. Thus, the proposal was made by the police commission in the year 1902-03 to frame the lawbreaker Examination Department (CID) for every area. The suggestion was made that there should be an agent auditor General of police who is having an obligation to gather the data concerning the organized wrongdoings. The CID would likewise examine the crimes in which a specialized master is utilized. The suggestions made by the commission was taken into genuine note by the public authority of India and on walk 1905 gave guidance to begin the division in each area by 1907 in this way under c.w.c Plowden the first CID appeared in Bengal on 1st April 1906. The utilization of logical strategies and procedures to issue under scrutiny is likewise critical which can be followed from the set of experiences moreover. Along these lines, if we see the utilization of criminological science in investigating the wrongdoing, it isn’t new here. During the nineteenth century, the utilization of science was utilized in handling criminals. 


The essential obligations of police are to secure the life, liberty, and property of residents. It is for the security of these rights that the criminal equity situation has been constitutive doling out significant obligations to the police. They have different obligations to play out the most among them being upkeep of peace and examination of offences. 

In this way in the criminal equity framework, the police play a significant function in the investigation. “Examination” incorporates all the procedures under this code for the assortment of proof led by a cop or by any individual (other than a judge) who is approved by justice on this behalf. 

The examination is a primer stage directed by the police generally begins after the record of the first data report (F. I. R) in the police station. When the police come to know about the commission of the wrongdoing, they will begin the lawbreaker examination. Under segment 2 clause(h) of the lawbreaker strategy code 1973, “Investigation” incorporates all the procedures under the code for the assortment of proof directed by the cop or by any individual (other than a justice) who is approved by an officer. Concurring to the perspectives on the high court the examination of an offence primarily comprises of; the procedures on the spot of wrongdoing, realities and circumstance of the case, finding and capturing of the suspected guilty parties, search of confirmations, for example, the inquiry of spots and things which are fundamental for the examination also, the cross-examination of different people alongside the charged. After that the blame is set before a justice also, a charge-sheet is set up under segment 173 of the criminal method code 1973. 

The primary rationale of the examination is to gather proof and capture the offenders. Everybody concerned must help the police in their work. The police can scrutinize any individual expected to be familiar with the current realities and conditions of the case, and any such individual will be bound to respond to all inquiries identifying with such a case. A witness may, notwithstanding, try not to offer those responses which will open him to any criminal charge6. The police may record the appropriate response orally given by the observer.

The witness has neither to offer responses recorded as a hard copy nor sign those recorded by the police. In Investigation, a cop can be recorded as a hard copy of an individual to be an observer who seems to have some information on the wrongdoing being examined and who is inside the Jurisdiction of such cop or in an abutting police station8. The witness allegedly needs to show up before the cop, however, a lady or a kid under 15 years old can’t be needed by the cop for such examination to go to any place other than their habitation. An observer showing up in police examination may take the help of an attorney in addressing a composed inquiry put to him/her. 

In the police Act 1861, segment 23 gives that it will be the obligation of each cop to gather and convey knowledge influencing the public disturbance; to distinguish and bring the guilty party to equity and to catch all people whom he is lawfully approved to capture and for whose misgiving adequate ground exists. The criminal method code ordered the wrongdoing as cognizable and non-cognizable. Sec 2(1) condition (c characterizes the cognizable and non-cognizable offences. 


Presently-a-days custodial torment has gotten a typical wonder and a standard police practice of cross-examination nowadays. Denounced is beaten or starved or tormented from multiple points of view throughout examination by the police. Advancement basic liberties request that this is a hazardous practice and should be disposed of. There is an immense hole between the rate at which wrongdoing is submitted and F. I. R’s are stopped, public grievances are not tended to appropriately furthermore, there is consistently delay in FIR. The nature of exploring principles is disintegrating the remaining task at hand is likewise one of the major purposes behind the failure of the police. There is a delay in inequity in India because of the ordinary method of examination. Third-degree torment is typically thought to be an easy route strategy for examination by the police because of various levelled pressures. 

The essential obligation of police authorities is to serve humanity, to forestall wrongdoing, to maintain and ensure common freedoms and to research and distinguish and actuate the indictment of offences, to check public issues, to manage major and minor emergencies, and help the individuals who are in trouble. Yet, it is frequently seen that while releasing authority obligations, police authorities do not legitimately attempt their obligations and misuse their capacity for individual or authority gain. They break their implicit agreement and enjoy different deceitful exercises. Such unlawful activity or improper activity can be characterized as police wrongdoing. 

It is unusual that a vote-based nation, for example, India doesn’t trust one of the main organization organs of its chosen government – the police. The decision of first-class and centre class residents consider them to be political baits and fault legislators for not letting the police assume their legitimate jobs in the general public. The lower pay classes feel scared by them and in consistent dread of their helpful authority. It follows that there is an inauspicious absence of understanding about the nature and elements of the police in the nation. The issues of the Indian police which run as profound as the plan, structure, culture, and administration remain hidden.

That the cop completing the capture of the arrestee will set up an update of capture at the hour of capture, what’s more, such notice will be authenticated by at any rate one observer, who might be either an individual from the group of the arrestee or a decent individual of the territory from where the capture is made. It will likewise be counter endorsed by the arrestee and will contain the time and date of capture. 

An individual who has been captured or confined and is being held in guardianship in a police headquarters or cross-examination focus or other lock-up will be qualified for having one companion or then again relative or other individual is known to him or having an interest in his government assistance being educated, when practicable, that he has been captured and is being confined at the specific place, except if the authenticating observer of the remainder of capture is himself such a companion or a relative of the arrestee. 

The time, spot of capture, and scene of the authority of an arrestee must be advised by the police were the following companion or on the other hand relative of the arrestee fives external the region or town through the Legal Aid Organization in the District and the police headquarters of the zone concerned electronically inside a time of 8 to 12 hours after the capture. 

The individual captured must be made mindful of this privilege to have somebody educated regarding his capture or confinement as soon as he is put apprehended or is confined. 

 A section must be made in the journal at the spot of confinement concerning the capture of the individual which will likewise uncover the name of the following companion of the individual who has been educated regarding the capture and the names and points of interest of the police authorities in whose guardianship the arrestee is. 

The arrestee should, where he so demands, be moreover analysed at the hour of his capture, and major and minor wounds, if any present on his/her bed, must be recorded at that time. The “Review Memo” must be marked both by the arrestee and the cop affecting the capture and its duplicate given to the arrestee. 

The arrestee should be exposed to clinical assessment by a prepared specialist at regular intervals during his confinement in authority by a specialist on the board of affirmed specialists designated by the Director, well-being Services of the concerned state or association domain. Chief, Health Services ought to plan quite a correctional for all tehsils and locale as well. 

Copies of the multitude of records including the update of capture alluded to above, should be shipped off the Magistrate for his record. 

The arrestee might be allowed to meet his legal counsellor during cross-examination, however not all through the cross-examination.

A police control room should be given at all region also, state central command, where data concerning the capture and the spot of the authority of the arrestee will be conveyed by the official causing the capture, inside long stretches of affecting the capture and at the police control room, it should be shown on prominent notification board. 


The criminal equity framework and specifically, the police have stayed unaltered throughout the previous 140 years. There has been no distinction in the social part of police faculty all things considered. Police faculty consider themselves to be rulers and gatekeepers of the state, stressing request upkeep instead of administration to the individuals. India is where officials of each position enjoy infamous dealings fearlessly by the police, the supposed implementers of law and request because these authorities are drilled in the speciality of pay off and impact. The criminalization of legislative issues has influenced police execution more than that of some other State foundation. While there are various arrangements in the Constitution of India alongside different laws, the majority of these arrangements are most certainly not actualized. It is generally poor people and denied areas of the general public who are survivors of custodial violations and police atrocities. “Poor individuals see the police as specialists of abuse, not security. Again, and again, destitute individuals said that equity and police security are just for rich organizations, rich individuals, and those with connections. “As the law remains as of now, there is no exceptional arrangement with regards to the trouble evidence where wounds were received by an individual in police authority.


  1. Section 154 of CrPC
  2. Section 161 of CrPC
  3. Section 160 of CrPC
  4. Section 160 Proviso
  5. Section 156(1) of CrPC
  6. Section 155 CrPC
  7. Section 154(15) CrPC
  8. Section 154(2) CrPC
  9. Section 154 CrPC
  10. Policing and Society: An International Research for Journal and policy”,


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *